Archives: [f] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [news / qst] [trash] Boards: [meta]
/b/stats 2.0: beta edition
since 27 Jan 2013
Please send questions/comments/spam/death threats/love letters to webmaster (at) b-stats.org
All times EST/EDT
Active development is on GitHub



Thread #245072
View on 4chan

Replies 18 (18)
Image Replies 0 (0)
Lifetime 3d 15h 18m 38s
Deleted Posts 0
Sarsens-Solstice-Stonehenge.jpg (112 KB, 1100x872, 1523507830781.jpgiqdb google reposts full
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5593525/Stonehenges-largest-rocks-place-millions-years-humans.html
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/stonehenge-stones-may-have-been-there-already-solstice-british-archaeology
https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/943875/stonehenge-mystery-monument-age-archaeology-salisbury-plain
https://brian-mountainman.blogspot.com/2018/04/pitts-and-very-ancient-sarsens.html

A huge baby step for glacial transport.
Britons are slow moving; like glaciers.
Cheers for erratics on Salisbury plain!
Do you think Heyworth's is after Pitts?
Everyone says, "Parker-Pearson last".
Fascinating turn-around; baby steps!
GD
>>
>>245072
>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-5593525/Stonehenges-largest-rocks-place-millions-years-humans.html
http://archive.is/nUBk6

>https://www.express.co.uk/news/science/943875/stonehenge-mystery-monument-age-archaeology-salisbury-plain
http://archive.is/dVb59
>>
>>245072
You stopped at G, come on, do the rest of the alphabet.
>>
>>245072
>brit gibberish
Your post is awful
Learn to speak English.


Also, I'd like to actually know what the fuck is going on. Posting something about/from the article might help.
>>
>>245072
This is retarded.
>Two rocks have been there millions of years lining up with the sun
>People saw that the rocks lined up with the sun and put more rocks
>This is why Stonehenge
Millions of years ago the land and celestial alignments we're totally different. Nobody could've just placed the rocks there in hopes they would align by our lifetime.
>>
>>245146
Or, you know, you could Read the damn articles.
>>
>predates humans
wow the KANGZ were right, it really was built by blacks
>>
>>245072
I thought Stonehenge was built by blacks. Why are Brits so indecisive?
>>
>>245114
Haha, I'm in kindergarten.
>>
>>245146
>>245155
I have to go. Nanny's yelling.
>>
>>245072
>A huge baby step for glacial transport.
>Britons are slow moving; like glaciers.
>Cheers for erratics on Salisbury plain!
>Do you think Heyworth is after Pitts'?
>Everyone says, "Parker-Pearson last".
>Fascinating turn-around; baby steps!
>GD

Seen at Brian John's site :-).
>>
>>245159
Fuck, my sides. I did not expect that.
>>
>>245155
>pls goy read more daily mail
Post a scientific paper, a reputable outlet or neck yourself.
>>
Archeologists did radiometric dating on the stones, turns out they are over a billion years old

Time to re-write the history books, L. Ron Hubbard and Michael Cremo were right about ancient human history
Or was it ancient aliens?
>>
http://pinkrevelator.podomatic.com
tell me what you guys think?
>>
>>245676
Radiometric dating doesn't tell you when the rock is moved, dumblet.
>>
>>245072
Well of course the stone would be older than humans, why wouldn't it be?
>>
>>245741
>falling for it
>>
>>245072
more than likely it was just an early settlement. remember when they found that meteor with those holes in florida, and it was just holes for putting up huts.

page took 0.0038 seconds to execute